Adapting to climate change is not only important in
agricultural practices, but it is also important for urban cities to adapt as
well. In this blog, I want to briefly introduce the different ways in which
adaptive measures to climate change are adopted by comparing two case studies of
two cities.
The first case study is Kampala city, this is the largest
city in Uganda and it is expected to experience greater incidences of flooding
as a result of climate change; flood-related problems such as pollution of
water supplies, health risks and the spread of diseases are more likely to
occur (Lwasa, 2010). Lwasa (2010) stresses the importance of identifying the
impacts of climate change on urban populations, and subsequently determining the
vulnerability of the urban population before attempting to apply adaptive
measures. For example, in 2007, there were eight flood events and urban poor
settlements such as Natete and Katwe were most vulnerable to these floods. This
is because these settlements were informal and lacked the necessary
infrastructure to withstand such floods. Hence, improving urban infrastructure,
and addressing runoff and floods through building dams or planning crop cover
to reduce storm flow are some adaptive measures that can be adopted. Other
secondary impacts of the floods must not be ignored; worsening health
conditions, economic damages and disrupted transport networks, and the overall
lowering of the water table of Lake Victoria, can equally worsen livelihoods in
many communities. Communities are willing to adapt but lack the means to do so,
hence local and national governments must also be willing to take part in
helping communities to adapt to climate change impacts. The Kampala City
Council has an important role in governing the funds and allocation of
resources, and the decision-making processes to adapting to climate change but
cooperation with the community and their knowledge is also required to
effectively increase the resilience of many communities to climate change
impacts. Lwasa (2010) stresses the importance of understanding the context of
urban cities and communities before choosing suitable adaptation strategies.
The second case study is Cape Town, South Africa, whereby water
quantity, access and quality are the main problems that will occur because of
climate change. Cape Town relies on surface and groundwater resources in the
local area, however climate change scenarios such as an increase in average
temperature by 1C by 2050 in Western Cape, or a general drying in most seasons in
the south-eastern region of Western Cape can make these resources highly
vulnerable (Ziervogal et al., 2010). Ziervogel et al. (2010) case study in Cape
Town explains that while lower rainfall yields are a problem, the increasing
demand for water due to population increases, poor wastewater management and
underinvestment in infrastructure remains the largest problems and threats to
water security in the city. To address these issues, climate change scenarios
are incorporated into water management policies and planning, however, actors (communities,
local governments, and national government actors) at all levels will need to
agree that climate change adaptation is required and how it should be
implemented. A combination of both supply and demand-side policies should be
used; supply-side policies include building larger dams, improve water
treatment processes, and exploiting other water resources, and demand-side
policies include limiting water consumption and distribution. Ziervogel et al. (2010)
noted that supply-side policies raised the cost of water and thus was too
expensive for locals, and demand-side policies were more favourable and
effective such that after the restrictions was imposed the demand for water
reduced.
Adapting to climate change requires an understanding of the socio-economic
background, and more specifically how climate change will have an impact on the
urban city. The Kamapla case study saw the direct impacts of climate change on
the city through floods and health-related impacts, which acted as a stronger
incentive for adaptive measures. The Cape Town case study, however, experienced
threats to their water supply through higher temperature and evapotranspiration
rates, so it was more difficult to experience the impacts of climate change in
the immediate term and this led to discussions about the priority of addressing
and adapting to the impacts of climate change. This blog very briefly
introduced how urban cities adapt to climate change through two examples but
adaptation is much more complex than what was explained here, but I wanted to
highlight the different factors and incentives that may govern the way an urban
city would react to climate change.
Hi Hong! This blog was really interesting - having specific case studies makes it much easier to understand the issues different cities face. When looking at Kampala, did you come across any cooperation that has already taken place between the City Council and local communities to come up with appropriate adaptation policies, or is this yet to happen?
ReplyDeleteHi Ilana!
DeleteInterestingly in Kampala, the City Council and other government departments have attempted to evict encroachers living on the wetlands as a means to reduce the impacts of flooding - which occurs on the wetlands the most. However, local communities themselves who live and depend on the wetlands have developed their own adaptive strategies such as digging canals, raising beds higher, raising embankments and placing valuable items above the floor. These adaptive measures are within their economic capacity, however adaptive measures such as larger changes in infrastructure most definitely require assistance from the City Council, and perhaps the City Council should changed their adaptive strategies from evicting locals, accept that locals will continue to live in these vulnerable areas, and therefore help to improve their resilience instead.